As expected, the recent Universiti Putra Malaysia incident was not been covered comprehensively by local newspapers. After spending some time scouring through the Internet, I managed to land myself an article with the aforementioned university's Vice-Chancellor ATTEMPTING to explain his officers' version of the incident.
The article originated from Malaysiakini which requires paid subscription therefore leaving me with no choice but to copy the article from YB Lim Kit Siang.
Oh, did I mention that the Vice-Chancellor is blind?
UPM VC defends seizure of student’s laptop
Sep 18, 07 8:24pm
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) vice-chancellor Nik Mustapha R Abdullah today defended the action of campus authorities in seizing a student activist’s laptop and 12 other items during a spot check on his hostel room.
In a two-page media statement (see below), Nik Mustapha (left) said the student, Yee Yang Yang, was suspected of having leaflets produced by ‘unregistered’ organisations and that his laptop contained pornographic material.
He said the authorities acted according to procedure and described Yee’s accusation that UPM was attempting to intimidate him due to his involvement in student activism as a “lie.”
“The action taken by the UPM security department was in accordance with the rules and regulations that relate to disciplinary violations made by Yee. His accusations are lies,” said the VC.
He said on Sept 14, the security department was notified by the Students Supreme Council (MTM) and Dorm 13 of a spate of mobile phone thefts in the dorm.
They had asked the security department to conduct a room-to-room search in Block C, 13th College where Yee (right) was staying.
“It was during this search that we found leaflets, donation cards and other documents belonging to an unregistered organisation. This was in violation of Article 12(1) of the Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA) 1971,” said Nik Mustapha.
The VC added that Yee’s actions had also violated UPM’s student disciplinary guidelines which prohibited the publication, printing or distribution of leaflets without the university’s approval.
“Furthermore, Yee said that he lost his matrix card and the laptop in his room was not his. He also said that the battery of the laptop had died. But when the security personnel checked, his matrix card was with him and his laptop functioned well,” he said.
Pornographic material
Nik Mustapha argued that since Yee had lied about his matrix card and laptop, security personnel had good reasons to be suspicious and to confiscate the student’s laptop, pen-drive, MP4 player, CDs, mobile phone and the leaflets.
He also claimed that Yee had agreed to have these items brought to the security department.
According to the security department, that upon checking the laptop, a vast amount of pornographic material were found and this was in violation of Article 19(1) of the UUCA.
Nik Mustapha said on Sept 15, Yee and a group of students had gathered at the security department’s office and demanded that his belongings be returned.
“When the staff there told him that investigations were ongoing and his belongings could not be returned as yet, the group acted aggressively and obstructed the officers from performing their duty,” he added.
There was a tense stand-off between the students and Zamali Samsi, the head of the university’s Special Task Unit, a student-monitoring outfit which is part of the campus security.
The students stood in front and the back of the vehicle carrying Zamali to stop him from leaving until they got their letter of acknowlegement listing out the items that were taken from Yee. [see video]
According to the VC, the student affairs department is currently investigating the matter.
Yee had previously claimed that the university authorities had acted against him because of his involvement in the ‘opposition’ camp.
Rival students groups - known as anti-establishment and pro-government factions - are already in the midst of campaign preparations for the soon to be held campus polls.
Last year, the anti-establishment group - who are generally regarded to be pro-opposition - had boycotted the election.
—————————————————————
Kenyataan Media Naib Canselor UPM
17 September 2007
Kami mendapat maklum tersebarnya dalam media tertentu dakwaan seorang pelajar UPM bahawa pihak keselamatan universiti memecah masuk ke bilik asramanya pada 14 September 2007 dan merampas komputer riba serta lain-lain barangan milik beliau. Dakwaan seterusnya dibuat bahawa tindakan ini diambil pihak universiti untuk menakut-nakutkan pelajar berjelang pilihanraya kampus yang akan diadakan tidak lama lagi.
Berdasarkan siasatan yang dijalankan, UPM ingin menegaskan bahawa dakwaan ini adalah tidak benar. Tindakan pihak keselamatan UPM adalah wajar dan berlandaskan peraturan berkaitan pelanggaran tatatertib oleh pelajar tersebut. Kronologi kejadian adalah seperti berikut:
1. Pada 14 September 2007, Bahagian Keselamatan UPM mendapat panggilan daripada Majlis Tertinggi Mahasiswa (MPM) dan felo Kolej 13 berhubung beberapa kes kecurian komputer riba dan telefon bimbit yang berlaku di kolej tersebut. Penghuni kolej resah dan bimbang kerana telah berlaku lapan kejadian kecurian. Justeru, MPM dan felo kolej mohon kerjasama pihak keselamatan UPM untuk mengadakan pemeriksaan bilik ke bilik di Blok C kolej 13.
2. Semasa mencari komputer riba dan telefon bimbit yang hilang di bilik 505 blok tersebut, pegawai keselamatan menemui pelbagai risalah yang dicetak untuk edaran, kad kutipan wang dan lain-lain dokumen. Penghuni bilik ini ialah pelajar bernama Yee Yang Yang. Beliau tidak mengakui komputer riba di bilik tersebut adalah miliknya. Beliau juga berkata bahawa kad matriknya hilang dan komputer riba itu tidak boleh digunakan kerana kehabisan bateri.
3. Semasa disoal, pegawai keselamatan mendapati Yee ada menyimpan kad matriknya dan komputer riba boleh berfungsi. Oleh kerana ada unsur pembohongan, pegawai keselamatan mempunyai asas meragui tindakan Yee, maka pelajar itu dimaklumkan bahawa risalah, kumputer riba, pendrive, MP4 player, software, CD, dan telefon bimbit jenis Nokia N73 miliknya akan dibawa ke Bahagian Keselamatan sebagai bahan bukti untuk siasatan lanjut. Yee bersetuju dan memberi kebenaran kepada pegawai keselamatan berbuat demikian.
4. Siasatan Bahagian Keselamatan mendapati bahawa risalah yang dijumpai dalam bilik Yee dicetak oleh persatuan yang tidak berdaftar. Komputer ribanya juga mengandungi banyak bahan lucah. Perkara 12 (1) Akta Universiti dan Kolej Universiti 1971, kaedah-kaedah UPM (Tatatertib Pelajar-pelajar) tidak membenarkan pelajar menerbit, mencetak atau mengedar risalah, dokumen atau bahan bercetak tanpa kelulusan pihak berkuasa universiti. Yee juga telah berlanggar Perkara 19 (1) akta tersebut, kerana memiliki dan menyimpan bahan atau artikel lucah semasa dalam kampus.
5. Keesokannya,15 September 2007, Yee dan sekumpulan pelajar datang ke Bahagian Keselamatan untuk mendapatkan kembalii barang barang beliau. Beliau diberitahu bahawa barang-barang tersebut tidak dapat dikembalikan kerana siasatan masih berjalan. Mereka mempertikai keputusan ini dan bertindak liar dengan menghalang pegawai keselamatan menjalankan tugas dan menahan kenderaan rasmi Unit Khas milik universiti daripada bergerak.
6. Kes ini masih disiasat dan telah dibawa ke Bahagian Hal Ehwal Pelajar. Jelas terdapat pelanggaran disiplin dan tatatertib oleh pelajar ini, dan pihak universiti perlu mengambil tindakan sewajarnya. UPM sentiasa menggarapkan suasana hidup yang harmoni dan perpaduan yang kukuh bukan sahaja di kalangan pelajar, tetapi juga di antara pelajar dengan staf.
Naib Canselor
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Serdang, Selangor
I believe that all of my blog readers are pretty well versed in both English and Malay languages therefore no explanation is required.
At the same time, there is nothing much to argue here since I am no representative of Mr. Yee Yang Yang. There are just some brainless points presented by the Varsity Clown which - pardon me, I mean Vice-Chancellor - are so wrong that I cannot help but to rebut him from the perspective of an undergraduate.
1. Pada 14 September 2007, Bahagian Keselamatan UPM mendapat panggilan daripada Majlis Tertinggi Mahasiswa (MPM) dan felo Kolej 13 berhubung beberapa kes kecurian komputer riba dan telefon bimbit yang berlaku di kolej tersebut. Penghuni kolej resah dan bimbang kerana telah berlaku lapan kejadian kecurian. Justeru, MPM dan felo kolej mohon kerjasama pihak keselamatan UPM untuk mengadakan pemeriksaan bilik ke bilik di Blok C kolej 13.
WTF?! It requires 8 cases of theft before they decided to conduct a spot check on the residential college? If there were previous checks conducted and no suspect apprehended, what makes them think that the 8th spot check would generate result?
2. Semasa mencari komputer riba dan telefon bimbit yang hilang di bilik 505 blok tersebut, pegawai keselamatan menemui pelbagai risalah yang dicetak untuk edaran, kad kutipan wang dan lain-lain dokumen. Penghuni bilik ini ialah pelajar bernama Yee Yang Yang. Beliau tidak mengakui komputer riba di bilik tersebut adalah miliknya.
Again, WTF?! Bringing back some brochures / leaflets / pamphlets is a crime? Not admitting the items in your room as yours is a crime? If that was the case, I WAS a very guilty undergraduate for having my coursemates' laptops / USB drives and at the same time, possessing a number of spam pamphlets promoting multi-layered marketing and instant profit business.
3. Semasa disoal, pegawai keselamatan mendapati Yee ada menyimpan kad matriknya dan komputer riba boleh berfungsi. Oleh kerana ada unsur pembohongan, pegawai keselamatan mempunyai asas meragui tindakan Yee, maka pelajar itu dimaklumkan bahawa risalah, kumputer riba, pendrive, MP4 player, software, CD, dan telefon bimbit jenis Nokia N73 miliknya akan dibawa ke Bahagian Keselamatan sebagai bahan bukti untuk siasatan lanjut. Yee bersetuju dan memberi kebenaran kepada pegawai keselamatan berbuat demikian.
The laptop might no be his. Fine, I can accept that. But what do the leaflets, USB drives, MP4 player, multiple CDs and a mobile telephone have to do with the case?
On second thought, why not confiscate along his underpants? Who knows maybe the smell is different compared to his groin area?
Included below is the written acknowledgement that Universiti Putra Malaysia hesitantly issued with the condition that the undergraduate and his fellow friends must stand in front of a car akin to a set of bowling pins.
How a set of unrelated items can help in determining whether the suspect is a thief. GENIUS!
The victim did give his consent for the items to be confiscated but WAIT, it does not end here. He gave his permission but with the condition that a written acknowledgement to be issued to him on the record of items taken. The officer, in their attempt to prove that buffaloes originated from Malaysia, refused to do so which led to all this ruckus in the first place.
Komputer ribanya juga mengandungi banyak bahan lucah. Perkara 12 (1) Akta Universiti dan Kolej Universiti 1971, kaedah-kaedah UPM (Tatatertib Pelajar-pelajar) tidak membenarkan pelajar menerbit, mencetak atau mengedar risalah, dokumen atau bahan bercetak tanpa kelulusan pihak berkuasa universiti. Yee juga telah berlanggar Perkara 19 (1) akta tersebut, kerana memiliki dan menyimpan bahan atau artikel lucah semasa dalam kampus.
It is an undeniable fact that possessing pornographic materials in your PC, room or heck, even in your brain is a big no-no. But tell me, how many of the male undergraduates' PC does not contain a single pornographic material? In my days of being an undergraduate, I have bear witness to Chinese, Indians, Malays and other races watching pornographic movies with their room door open wide. Do not even attempt to brand me as a racist for I arranged the 3 major races based on alphabetical order and being an Indian or Malay does not mean that you are any better / worse than the Chinese.
If Universiti Putra Malaysia wants to be fair, conduct a minesweep across the whole institution and... wait a minute... Universiti Putra Malaysia = fair? Haha... please do pardon my baseless imagination.
5. Keesokannya,15 September 2007, Yee dan sekumpulan pelajar datang ke Bahagian Keselamatan untuk mendapatkan kembalii barang barang beliau. Beliau diberitahu bahawa barang-barang tersebut tidak dapat dikembalikan kerana siasatan masih berjalan. Mereka mempertikai keputusan ini dan bertindak liar dengan menghalang pegawai keselamatan menjalankan tugas dan menahan kenderaan rasmi Unit Khas milik universiti daripada bergerak.
Err... Mr. Varsity Clown, are you really blind? With the video as clear as crystal-clear crystal, what more can you ask for? The undergraduate and his friends were there to obtain a written acknowledgement which YOUR officer flatly rejected. Anymore than that and we will have a new myth to replace the legend of Puteri Gunung Ledang.
UPM sentiasa menggarapkan suasana hidup yang harmoni dan perpaduan yang kukuh bukan sahaja di kalangan pelajar, tetapi juga di antara pelajar dengan staf.
A good example of not walking the talk. Ever heard of the idiot... I mean idiom Empty vessels make the most noise?
No comments:
Post a Comment